In fact, I find it unreasonable to even compare Stellaris and HOI4 to EU3 and Vic2, because the former are empty games with a good game at it's core, lacking only in content, while the latter are so utterly broken that there's no reasonable amount of patching to fix it. Paradox does not have a history of releasing games "with a good framework" (in fact, the exact opposite) until after Crusader Kings 2-release at absolute first, but reasonably only after Stellaris-release, and then you're getting into games that aren't "kinda buggy and not completely thought out" but only the "not enough content part". Your argument is still wrong, you're comparing things that can't be compared. I'm talking about a hypothetical scenario about Victoria 3. Nowhere am I talking about a hypothetical scenario about a hypothetical game. There is no need to bring up a hypothetical scenario about a hypothetical game.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |